Should a person's gender, race, marital status or religion play a factor in their ability to run a country?
Should a person's gender, race, marital status or religion be a main reason to elect them?
Should the fact that a person's own daughter has gone on record saying she is voting (ne working on the campaign) for another candidate, make that person less electable?
These are questions I ponder when I hear "I'm voting for Hilary because it is time for a woman to get in there", or I'm for Obama because it's time for a minority", or even, "Romney can't run this country, he's a Mormon!".
Yes, I would like to see a woman in office, as the "Leader of the New World" (maybe at one time, but really, are we still?) we are one of the few countries to never have a female leader. But is Hilary the one? Perhaps it is time for a minority to take the Oval Office, but again is Barack the One? It scares me to think that someone would vote for Hilary because she is a woman, I know alot of women aI would not like to see in an official elected position and it scares me that some got there because they are women and not because they are qualified. It is after all, at the end of the day a popularity contest (how else can you explain Schwarzenegger?).
OK now I am rambling, talk amongst yourselves.