tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post7391515838724299498..comments2023-10-11T01:47:09.531-07:00Comments on Adrienne's house: UnconstitutionalAdriennehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17632457245324216299noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-66625302059761950442007-07-27T15:01:00.000-07:002007-07-27T15:01:00.000-07:00I have read it one more time and find in the first...I have read it one more time and find in the first paragraph an order to block property of persons that harms the US effort in Iraq. While I can not make out anything definative in the remainder, I believe this refers to the money that is used to oppose US efforts in Iraq. That money is used to give support to radical Islam and this president wants to stop that. Does this make more sense?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-20142456622753165692007-07-27T10:16:00.002-07:002007-07-27T10:16:00.002-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.KathrynVHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03029222798571369594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-80397820267050565022007-07-27T10:16:00.001-07:002007-07-27T10:16:00.001-07:00Jon Stewart hasn't done a single joke about Iraq, ...Jon Stewart hasn't done a single joke about Iraq, since you posted this--very spooky.KathrynVHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03029222798571369594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-16743014961873999492007-07-27T10:16:00.000-07:002007-07-27T10:16:00.000-07:00Jon Stewart hasn't done a single joke about Iraq, ...Jon Stewart hasn't done a single joke about Iraq, since you posted this--very spooky.KathrynVHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03029222798571369594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-65500318256205608602007-07-27T06:19:00.000-07:002007-07-27T06:19:00.000-07:00Sorry, but I'm not getting it either. The actual ...Sorry, but I'm not getting it either. The actual order as copied here just seems to be a bunch a doublespeak and doesn't really do anything. It says take additional steps, but doesn't define those steps. It references previous orders, and as I am unfamiliar with those orders - cretin that I am - it means nothing.<BR/><BR/>I don't like Bush and I don't like the direction he has taken our country, but this seems to be purely inflammatory.Gretchenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15511652675116154101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-30911742988643423152007-07-25T21:30:00.000-07:002007-07-25T21:30:00.000-07:00If you read this as pertaining to activities in Ir...If you read this as pertaining to activities in Iraq as opposed to here in the US then that is even worse. What gives Him the right to impose any "Executive Order's" over Iraq? We are supposedly there to help the Iraqis, not to impose our Executive on them. <BR/><BR/>But I do not read it as pertaining to protests happening in Iraq, I read it as pertaining to protests happening here opposing what is happening in Iraq. And I restate, that is Unconstitutional. I have a constitutional right to disagree with my President and I have a Constitutional right to say that without any fear of anything.Adriennehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17632457245324216299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7062608.post-86556537357908637252007-07-25T19:31:00.000-07:002007-07-25T19:31:00.000-07:00I have read this three times and do not understand...I have read this three times and do not understand what you are trying to say. The first sentence does not appear to be supported by everything that follows. It seems to me to cover activities in Iraq. What am I missing?Marcelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04873926169538493967noreply@blogger.com